Is this China’s next generation stealth fighter bomber?

David Cenciotti
2 Min Read

Most probably, not. However, the artworks  are interesting.

Although China is known to be working also on a new stealth fighter bomber, we don’t know much about the H-20, as the aircraft is believed to be dubbed.

The long-range strike aircraft should be built around the concept of a subsonic, radar evading, flying wing configuration and some scale models have even appeared at aviation exhibitions.

While previous artworks depicted shapes of Beijing’s LRS (long-range strike) inspired to several existing U.S. planes, including the F-117 Nighthawk, the YF-23 and the B-2, a new image has recently popped up on the prolific Chinese Internet.

It shows a manned tactical plane, with internal weapons bay as well as external pylons which carry stand-off missiles. The cockpit reminds the one of the Soviet-era Su-24 Fencer, a side-by-side two-seater.

The “new” shape seems like an evolution of previous concepts, even though it may well be just fan art.

Last but not least, the new stealth bomber is depicted as flying over the disputed Senkaku islands.

More from The Aviationist

The Incredible Armada of Aircraft Behind 1969’s Battle of Britain Film

On Sept. 15, 1969, cinema audiences were treated to a dramatic portrayal…

Kai Greet Kai Greet

US Approves Possible Sale of Nine KC-46A Pegasus Tankers for Japan

The latest deal would take the number of KC-46As in Japan’s inventory…

Parth Satam Parth Satam

U.S. State Department Approves $7.2B Sale Of F-35 Jets To Romania

The Foreign Military Sale’s approval comes after Romania announced the plan to…

Stefano D'Urso Stefano D'Urso

DARPA Awards BAE Systems $4 Million for Autonomous Beyond Visual Range Air Combat Program

Autonomy solutions for BVR combat will initially be developed and demonstrated on…

Parth Satam Parth Satam

What do you think? Can this be Beijing’s response to the American LRS project?

Chinese Stealth fighter bomber side view

Image via Sina.com

 

Share This Article
7 Comments